Engineer and evaluate AI's impact: beyond the "good enough"
Her homepage is: https://bea.cabrerodaniel.com/
Her PhD: work on Crowd simulation - Crowd simulation is not "good enough"
Then she went to Gothenburg to work with autonomous cars. But...
ChatGPT came and change her plans
Figure positioning LLMs within Foundational Models. Evething else is AI outer layer: symbolic AI, ML etc.
Erik Knauss said that developers should become more mature not to do something that they need to redo or that will have such a huge negative impact that they cannot scape from. It is a world wild west right now.
She wants to created metrics that help assess how good an AI is.
She sees a V curve:
Requirements Testing
Engineering
People in the middle
fighting with each
other
Perhaps LLM or ML helps create this middle ground
Which metrics to use? We need to ask practitioners. The real world is really messy. If the practitioners cannot use the metrics we develop, then why have them?
Inspired by my brother Vítor, which has the great idea of sharing conference notes, I decided to create this blog to gather my own notes. Hopefully these notes and thoughts are going to be useful for someone else. Especially, I would love it to be useful to Vítor! : ) Comments, critics and suggestions are more than welcome. They are necessary to help me make sense of the knowledge here gathered. Enjoy!
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário